The rapid advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have revolutionized various industries, fostering innovation and reshaping creativity. The landscape of intellectual property (IP) is evolving from AI-generated artwork to autonomous code-writing software. As AI blurs the lines between human and machine-created works, questions surrounding intellectual property rights become more complex.
For Nigeria, a country witnessing significant technological growth, understanding and adapting intellectual property law to AI-driven innovations is crucial. This blog explores the intersection of AI and intellectual property law, particularly in Nigeria, discussing legal implications, challenges, and the way forward.
Understanding Intellectual Property Law
Before diving into AI-related concerns, it’s essential to answer a fundamental question: What is intellectual property law? Intellectual property law governs the protection of creations of the mind, ensuring that inventors, artists, and businesses can safeguard their works from unauthorized use. This legal field encompasses various rights, including copyrights, patents, trademarks, and trade secrets.
Intellectual Property Examples in the AI Era
AI-generated content spans multiple domains, leading to intriguing discussions about ownership and protection. Here are some intellectual property examples in the AI-driven world:
- AI-Generated Art – Platforms like DALL-E and DeepDream generate artwork based on machine learning algorithms. Should copyright protection extend to such works, and if so, who owns the rights, the programmer, the AI, or the user?
- AI-Written Literature and Music – AI-powered tools can write novels, compose music, and even produce scripts. Can these be copyrighted, and does AI qualify as an author under current laws?
- AI-Developed Inventions – AI is increasingly involved in scientific research, leading to discoveries in medicine, technology, and engineering. Can an AI be named as an inventor in patent applications?
- Software and Algorithms – AI can autonomously write and optimize code. If an AI program creates a new software application, should it receive copyright protection, and who is the rightful owner?
Usually, the person who creates, authors, or invents a work is the one who holds the rights to it. In Nigeria and some other Common Law countries, when it comes to employment, if it’s clearly stated in the terms, the employee who creates a work during their job is considered the actual inventor, while the employer is recognized as the statutory inventor. The question we’re looking at here is what happens when AI creates a work or invents something on its own during its regular operations. It’s important to remember that AI is neither a person nor an employee and doesn’t have any employment or contract obligations.
IP Ownership & AI-Generated Contents
The debate surrounding AI-generated content extends beyond whether intellectual property (IP) laws can protect it to who should own the IP rights. Ownership is crucial as it gives the right to control use and pursue legal action if infringed.
AI systems cannot hold IP rights, but opinions differ on who should own them, the AI system owner, the developer, the trainer, the user, or a combination. Ownership can also be defined through contracts, like OpenAI’s terms, which assign IP rights of AI-generated content to the user.
Some believe AI-generated content should be in the public domain. The U.S. Copyright Office states that if an AI determines the creative output, it’s not eligible for copyright protection.
Countries are addressing these issues through legislation. For example, the UK’s Copyright Act assigns ownership to the person responsible for creating computer-generated works, while Ukraine has granted special rights for AI-generated non-original content to the software owner or license holder.
Risks Associated with AI-Generated Contents
When using AI to generate content, a key concern is the risk of infringing third-party IP rights. This risk is significant, as demonstrated by high-profile cases like Getty Images v. Stability AI and Zhang v. Google.
Though these cases have primarily targeted the AI system providers, the risk of IP infringement extends throughout the AI supply chain, affecting various stakeholders.
Training AI Systems
AI systems are trained on large amounts of data, much of which is publicly available. If this data is protected by IP rights and used without permission, it can result in infringement.
While some countries offer exceptions to IP infringement during AI training, these exceptions may not apply globally, and the risk of infringement remains in certain jurisdictions.
Creating and Using Output Generated by AI Systems
Infringement risks also arise when creating and using content generated by AI. Under copyright law, if AI-generated content is identical or substantially similar to an existing copyrighted work, it can be considered evidence of copying. This is particularly true when the AI relies on a limited number of data sources, which may lead to the content closely mirroring or even directly replicating those sources.
The Role of an Intellectual Property Lawyer in AI Cases
As AI-related IP issues become more complex, the role of an intellectual property lawyer is increasingly vital. Lawyers specializing in intellectual property law help clients navigate legal challenges, secure IP rights, and enforce protections. In Nigeria, legal practitioners are adapting to these new challenges, offering expertise in areas such as:
- Drafting contracts that define AI-generated works’ ownership
- Advising businesses on protecting AI-driven innovations
- Representing clients in intellectual property disputes
- Working with regulatory bodies to shape AI-related IP policies
We at eLegal Consultants have qualified lawyers well-versed in this field that can guide you through.
The Future of Intellectual Property Law in Nigeria
Given the rise of AI, Nigeria must modernize its intellectual property laws to accommodate new technological realities. Some potential steps forward include:
- Legislative Reforms
Nigeria should amend its intellectual property law notes to address AI-related concerns explicitly. Clear guidelines on AI-generated works’ ownership, authorship, and protection will provide legal certainty.
- AI-Specific IP Regulations
Countries like the UK and the EU are considering AI-specific IP regulations. Nigeria can take a similar approach by drafting new policies tailored to AI-generated inventions, creative works, and data usage.
- Public Awareness and Education
Educating creators, businesses, and policymakers on AI’s impact on intellectual property law will encourage compliance and innovation within the legal framework.
Conclusion
The intersection of AI and intellectual property (IP) law is creating new opportunities and challenges, particularly regarding authorship, ownership, and rights enforcement. For Nigeria, adapting its legal framework to address AI-related IP issues is crucial for fostering innovation and protecting creators. To ensure AI-driven growth, IP lawyers and policymakers must collaborate on laws that balance technology and fair legal protections, positioning Nigeria as a leader in this evolving field.
For more information, Contact us Now.
